{"id":5639,"date":"2014-05-30T10:00:06","date_gmt":"2014-05-30T14:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.nccomputertech.com\/?p=5639"},"modified":"2014-05-30T10:00:06","modified_gmt":"2014-05-30T14:00:06","slug":"net-neutrality-reclassifying-broadband-would-be-a-long-road","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2014\/05\/30\/net-neutrality-reclassifying-broadband-would-be-a-long-road\/","title":{"rendered":"Net neutrality: Reclassifying broadband would be a long road"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"page\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/core3.staticworld.net\/images\/article\/2014\/02\/net-neutrality-100244574-large.jpg?resize=580%2C756\" alt=\"\" width=\"580\" height=\"756\" \/>Advocates of strong net neutrality rules are calling for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to reclassify broadband as a regulated utility, but such a move would trigger a lengthy court fight between the agency and broadband providers, some telecom law experts say.<\/p>\n<p>With net neutrality back on the FCC\u2019s agenda in recent weeks, many net neutrality advocates\u2014including digital rights groups Free Press and Public Knowledge\u2014have resurrected their long-time push for the FCC to reregulate broadband as a traditional telecom service as an alternative to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/2147840\/fcc-defends-new-net-neutrality-proposal.html\" target=\"_blank\">proposed set of regulations<\/a>, released in late April, that they view as too weak.<\/p>\n<p>Despite a large public outcry\u2014the FCC has received more than <a href=\"http:\/\/apps.fcc.gov\/ecfs\/comment_search\/paginate?pageSize=100\" target=\"_blank\">45,000 public comments<\/a> in the past month, with many calling for reregulation\u2014some telecom law experts question whether the agency will take that step.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"large \"><a class=\"zoom\" href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/images.techhive.com\/images\/article\/2014\/05\/fcc-campout-wheeler-100267919-orig.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/images.techhive.com\/images\/article\/2014\/05\/fcc-campout-wheeler-100267919-large.jpg?resize=580%2C326\" alt=\"fcc campout wheeler\" width=\"580\" height=\"326\" \/><\/a> <small class=\"credit\">Fight for the Future<\/small><figcaption>Tom Wheeler (left), chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, meets with net neutrality advocates Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cPeople at the FCC refer to broadband reclassification as the nuclear option,\u201d said Jonathan Jacob Nadler, a telecom regulation lawyer with the Squire Sanders law firm in Washington, D.C. \u201cIt\u2019s just not going to happen.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The FCC, in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/2155720\/fcc-moves-forward-with-controversial-net-neutrality-proposal.html\" target=\"_blank\">public notice of proposed rules<\/a> released earlier this month, asked for comment on Wheeler\u2019s proposal, which would allow broadband carriers to engage in \u201ccommercially reasonable\u201d traffic management, and also on whether the FCC should reclassify broadband as a common-carrier telecom service subject to utility-type regulations under Title II of the Telecommunications Act.<\/p>\n<h2>Is a legal backlash worth it?<\/h2>\n<p>But Nadler and some other telecom regulation experts expect a huge legal backlash if the FCC moves toward Title II regulation. \u201cIf the FCC were to reclassify broadband as a telecom service, lawyers for the major telcos and cable systems would immediately start lining up in front of the court of appeals and would file petitions for review within minutes after the order was published,\u201d Nadler said.<\/p>\n<p>Broadband providers would argue that reclassification is a \u201ctrillion-dollar bait-and-switch,\u201d said Scott Cleland, chairman of the NetCompetition advocacy group supported by broadband providers. Providers would argue that a change in classification would be arbitrary and capricious, the classic language of a challenge to agency regulations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPromising an industry light regulation to encourage $1.2 trillion in private risk capital investment, and then after it\u2019s built, breaking that promise, would be the [ultimate] arbitrary and capricious FCC action,\u201d Cleland added. \u201cExpect a tsunami of legal challenges against any FCC reclassification decision in multiple courts pursuing multiple different legal challenges and theories in order to stay and overturn the FCC decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Harold Feld, senior vice president at Public Knowledge, downplayed potential arguments by broadband providers. In a handful of recent Supreme Court cases, justices have suggested the FCC has the authority to change its mind, he noted.<\/p>\n<p>Asked if reclassification would trigger a backlash in Congress, Feld said it might, particularly if Republicans gain majority control of the Senate in elections later this year. But Congress would have a difficult time overturning the rules, he said.<\/p>\n<h2>Politics, as usual<\/h2>\n<p>\u201cPresident Obama would still be able to veto any such resolution,\u201d Feld said. \u201cWhile one does not like to rely on a presidential veto, it is equally foolish to assume that a future Congress will automatically overrule any FCC classification. The tide on this is clearly shifting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A Republican Congress would likely attempt to overturn any net neutrality rules, Feld noted. Whether the FCC relies on reclassification or takes another route, it \u201cmakes no difference if the Senate flips, so you might as well do what you think is right,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Net neutrality advocate Marvin Ammori of the Ammori Group law firm also discounted the broadband providers\u2019 chances of overturning reclassification.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey\u2019ll argue the FCC didn\u2019t provide a reasoned basis for the policy tweak,\u201d he said. \u201cThey\u2019re very likely to lose that. Courts would defer to the FCC, and the FCC would win.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Wheeler has defended his proposal, which uses Section 706 of the Telecom Act, a section giving the agency responsibility for robust broadband deployment, as a quicker way to restore net neutrality rules after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down an old version of the FCC\u2019s net neutrality rules in January.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court pointed to Section 706 as a way the agency could find authority for net neutrality rules, and Wheeler has argued that it makes sense to follow the court\u2019s lead after judges there twice struck down the agency\u2019s attempts to enforce net neutrality rules.<\/p>\n<h2>The case for reclassification: not a trivial one<\/h2>\n<p>Alternatively, reclassification would \u201cnot be as straightforward or easy as many assume,\u201d said Berin Szoka, president of free-market think tank TechFreedom. Reclassifying broadband as a utility \u201cwould take, best guess, five to 10 years of back and forth between the FCC and courts,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>The agency, to reclassify, would have to find a justification for changing its mind on its decade-old classification of broadband as a lightly regulated information service, Szoka said.<\/p>\n<p>Reclassification would be additionally complex because the agency would also have to draw a line between broadband and other Internet services, Szoka said. The FCC would \u201chave to explain why it should only reclassify broadband and not some edge services, too,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Like Nadler, Szoka questioned whether the FCC will reclassify broadband. The complexity and likely legal challenges are \u201call why I don\u2019t think the FCC is serious about Title II,\u201d he said. \u201cI think they\u2019re going through the motions of including it &#8230; so they can tell the angry mob outside their gates that they considered this option.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some opponents of reclassification have questioned whether the FCC has the authority to reverse a series of decisions in the early 2000s to classify cable broadband, then telecom broadband as an information service. But many telecom law experts say the agency does have that authority, as long as it justifies its reasons for the switch in policy.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, clear authority for the FCC to change its mind comes from the 2005 Supreme Court case that ruled the FCC had the authority to deregulate broadband and classify it as an information service. In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supct\/html\/04-277.ZS.html\" target=\"_blank\">the Brand X case<\/a>, the Supreme Court ruled that the agency had reasonably interpreted the Telecom Act when classifying cable broadband as a lightly regulated service.<\/p>\n<p>The Brand X case \u201cmakes clear that the courts must defer to any reasonable interpretation\u201d of the Telecom Act that the FCC makes, Nadler said. Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority in the Brand X case, also notes that government agencies can change their policies if they have a good reason.<\/p>\n<p>Thomas quoted a 1984 Supreme Court decision in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.\" target=\"_blank\">Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council<\/a>, a major case in administrative agency authority: \u201cAn initial agency interpretation is not instantly carved in stone,\u201d the 1984 decision said. \u201cOn the contrary, the agency &#8230; must consider varying interpretations and the wisdom of its policy on a continuing basis.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Advocates of strong net neutrality rules are calling for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to reclassify broadband as a regulated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6,10],"tags":[356,738],"class_list":["post-5639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-networking","category-technology","tag-fcc","tag-net-neutrality"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/papNkV-1sX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8046,"url":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2015\/04\/16\/att-but-not-verizon-and-comcast-sue-fcc-over-net-neutrality\/","url_meta":{"origin":5639,"position":0},"title":"AT&#038;T, but not Verizon and Comcast, sue FCC over net neutrality","author":"NCCT","date":"April 16, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Out of the many lawsuits filed this week against the Federal Communications Commission, just one came from a major Internet service provider: AT&T. AT&T made no secret of its opposition to the FCC's net neutrality order, but it was reported last month that trade groups rather than individual ISPs would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Technology&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Technology","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/category\/technology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/att-logo-300x150.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7663,"url":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2015\/02\/25\/google-warns-fcc-plan-could-help-isps-charge-senders-of-web-traffic\/","url_meta":{"origin":5639,"position":1},"title":"Google warns FCC plan could help ISPs charge senders of Web traffic","author":"NCCT","date":"February 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Google is warning that the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality plan could have unintended consequences that help Internet service providers charge Web services for sending traffic. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's plan would reclassify broadband providers as common carriers on two fronts, in the service they provide home Internet customers and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Networking&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Networking","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/category\/networking\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5828,"url":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2014\/06\/20\/fcc-looking-into-complaints-that-broadband-isps-are-dragging-their-heels\/","url_meta":{"origin":5639,"position":2},"title":"FCC looking into complaints that broadband ISPs are dragging their heels","author":"NCCT","date":"June 20, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The U.S. Federal Communications Commission is looking into complaints from Netflix and some Internet backbone providers that several large broadband providers have been refusing for years to upgrade their backbone connections as a way to slow video traffic that competes with their own services. Following a public spat this week\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Networking&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Networking","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/category\/networking\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9277,"url":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2017\/12\/17\/this-week-in-tech-645-not-a-bright-guy\/","url_meta":{"origin":5639,"position":3},"title":"This Week in Tech 645: Not a Bright Guy","author":"NCCT","date":"December 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtu.be\/PPtupeFP1HU FCC cancels Net Neutrality and Ajit Pai mocks protesters. Apple's new iMac Pro costs a minimum of $4999 and goes up from there. Disney buys 21st Century Fox, gaining X-Men, Fantastic Four, and A New Hope, along with a 60% share of Hulu. Google cancels Tango as ARCore picks\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Technology&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Technology","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/category\/technology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.youtube.com\/vi\/PPtupeFP1HU\/0.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9432,"url":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2018\/11\/12\/ravioli-for-the-recount-this-week-in-tech-692\/","url_meta":{"origin":5639,"position":4},"title":"Ravioli for the Recount &#8211; This Week in Tech 692","author":"NCCT","date":"November 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtu.be\/JXOWXzYDumg - Apple's new iPad Pro is not the future of Apple, but it does point to it. - Alibaba sells $1 billion in the first 85 seconds of Singles Day. - Tech doomsayer says that the vast majority of people will soon be \"The Useless Class.\" - 22% of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Apple&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Apple","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/category\/apple\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.youtube.com\/vi\/JXOWXzYDumg\/0.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9176,"url":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/2017\/05\/22\/this-week-in-tech-615-biz-sized-hole\/","url_meta":{"origin":5639,"position":5},"title":"This Week in Tech 615: Biz Sized Hole","author":"NCCT","date":"May 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=7oexBKA1NaE All the highlights from Google I\/O. Tim Cook has a blood sugar tracking watch. Facebook's guidelines for content moderation. Biz Stone is going back to Twitter. What happened with WannaCry. Minecraft devs don't want you to poison your birds. The FCC is going ahead with their plan to end\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Technology&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Technology","link":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/category\/technology\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.youtube.com\/vi\/7oexBKA1NaE\/0.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nccomputertech.com\/techtalk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}